After six decades of occupation Palestinian revolt should not be ruled out

(Op-ed) Ramzy Baroud Thursday 29th March, 2012

Israel expects a Palestinian intifada, or uprising, some time in the future, however it does not expect one starting this year. A 100 page report to this effect has just been put together. The report's conclusions however may be erroneous.

• Israeli report says Palestinian uprising unlikely this year

• Palestinians expected to continue efforts to isolate Israel

• Israel continues to dominate political discourse

When will the Palestinians revolt?

The answer, according to an Israeli official: not this year (as quoted by Agency France Press).

An internal Israeli Foreign Ministry report last month also concluded that a third Palestinian intifada or uprising was 'unlikely' this year. According to the unnamed official, "This report, which is more than 100 pages long, judges that an explosion of generalized violence in the form of a third intifada is unlikely."

Instead, it was resolved that Palestinians would "continue to seize all opportunities to isolate Israel on the international stage" (AFP, Feb 28).

After six decades of occupation, Israeli government strategists are yet to realize that the Palestinian people are not a singular body of blind followers who can be easily manipulated and controlled.

The erroneous Israeli perception defines the very fundamentals of Israel's political discourse and subsequent policies towards Palestinians. A famous statement by former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in March 2002 signifies Israel's official and reductionist view of the enemy: "The Palestinians must be hit and it must be very painful: we must cause them losses, victims, so that they feel the heavy price" (Znet).

Page 1 of 7 | Next

Share this article:
Back to Nashville Herald

Comments

Reading this revisionist swill would gag a maggot off a gut wagon

Robbins Mitchell - 1 year ago

"...statement by former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in March 2002 signifies Israel's official and reductionist view of the enemy: "The Palestinians must be hit and it must be very painful: " And what had happened in March 2002 to prompt this reaction? Why, Hamas had launched a suicide bombing of a civilian hotel, killing 30 mostly elderly Israelis and wounding over a hundred more. Hamas proudly stated this was done to sabotage a new Saudi peace initiative. Things look a little different in context don't they?

hinckleybuzzard - 1 year ago

Have your say

  • By submitting your comment you agree to our terms and conditions

Featured Story

Elvis Presley's iconic white 'eagle' cape will go under the hammer next week and is expected to make 90,000 pounds.

The floor-length cloak is embellished with blue, red and gold studs ...

Record Your Vote

Do you take the threat of North Korea seriously?

View results

On Facebook

Making the news

Nothing will ever completely replace playing the game I love, however I feel like I'm starting a new adventure and I'm genuinely excited about what lies ahead. I'm fortunate to have been given many opportunities throughout my career and now I feel it's my time to give back.

David Beckham

The world's best known footballer was speaking after formally announcing his retirement.